On May 11th, Governor Pawlenty signed a new bill into law. Although the official name is HF2668, most are calling it the Tenant Bill of Rights. It is the first change to landlord/tenant regulations and law in over a decade. As a landlord, you should be aware of these changes as some will come as a surprise. Some are tougher rules, more are neutral and others are simply clarifying unwritten rules and rumors we all assumed were true. Most of these changes go into effect on August 1, 2010:
- Tenants living in homes in foreclosure will have the right to stay in the property until the end of the term of their lease or 90 days, which ever is longer. This brings state law inline with current federal laws.
- Property left behind by a tenant had to be stored by the landlord for 60 days. This has been changed to 28 days, but now a landlord can be held liable for disposing of the property early in the amount of triple the damages or $1000, which ever is greater.
- Not returning the proper amount of security deposit at the end of the lease has a penalty that is not at $500, up from $200 previously.
- Division of Utility Costs is not very common from what I have seen, but now if the tenant can prove that the landlord has improperly divided the utility costs, the landlord is liable to the tenant for triple the damages or $500, whichever is greater.
- If tenants can be forced to pay Attorney’s Fees if they lose a court case and your lease contains that language; now, if the tenant wins, they can force the landlord to pay the attorney’s fees also.
- Tenant Screening Fees and Criteria have changed. While I thought most of this was already law, it appears they have clarified it further:
- The landlord must use a clear and consistent screening process for all applicants.
- Landlords much provide the criteria in written form upon which they will screen applications, prior to accepting and screening fee. It is thought that if they read the criteria and see something that will disqualify them, they may not then chose to pay the fee and apply. [In my experience, they will apply anyway!]
- You must process applicants in sequential order as you cash their check or take their money. You may NOT take all the applicants money, process all of them and then compare the applicants choosing the best one (and keeping all the money).
- If the tenant is reject for any reason other than what was specified on the written screening criteria form, the landlord must return the application fee.
- Tenants that knowingly provides materially false information on the application or omits information can be held liable to the landlord for damages plus a civil penalty of up to $500, court filing fees, and attorney fees. Not sure how you prove this or get the civil penalty charged against them.
- Tenants must be given a receipt if they pay with cash.
- Late fees will now be capped at 8% of the rental amount. This provision begins on January 1, 2011. You can not charge daily late fees either.
Make sure to start integrating these new changes into your leases and tenant screenings. You do not want to be the first test case for this new law!







11 comments
#1John GallMay 28, 2010, 6:11 pm
Thanks for the post Scott. I didn’t even know such a change had occurred. I’ve got some reading to do. Great summary however.
#2Joe LaneJune 2, 2010, 6:57 pm
Yes thanks Scott. The information you provide is very helpful and reminds me to stay sharp when dealing with tenant.
#3Darin AndersonJune 2, 2010, 10:04 pm
“You must process applicants in sequential order as you cash their check or take their money. You may NOT take all the applicants money, process all of them and then compare the applicants choosing the best one (and keeping all the money).”
So if you don’t take and keep the money but only hold uncashed checks can you take multiple apps and choose the best one and then only take the money for the one you chose?
You may end up spending more money on the background checks and not get enough app fees to cover it, but I would like to have that option. As long as there is no financial cost to the applicant it seems like it should be ok. This is standard operating procedure for employment applications so one would hope a landlord would also have the right to accept multiple applicants and choose the one he/she feels is the best candidate.
So is the law clear on this point or does it only address the point of taking money from multiple applicants?
#4Scott FicekJune 4, 2010, 10:22 pm
I think you can select whoever you want, but you can’t keep everyone’s money.
#5MaryAlice ShortJuly 29, 2010, 10:13 am
For the most part this brings MN laws in line with federal laws that were passed last year. If a tenant is smart they have an opportunity to accept cash for keys or negotiate a lease prior to the foreclosure sale that allows them to stay in the property longer than 90 days.
#6Susan SigalSeptember 17, 2010, 8:53 am
The bank now owns our town home and the realtor for the bank said they would give us $2000 if we moved out in 30 days. I asked for 40 days and more money since it is common to get two months rent or $2,000, whichever is higher. It’s been over a month of talking to the realtor who says the bank hasn’t given him a final answer. In less than a month there will only be a month left before we have to move. They aren’t going to give me money to leave during the last 30 of the 90 day period, so in a way, it’s too late now. Are they obligated to put something in writing since they did make an offer, but they never came back about my request? The realtor said that it would start when I received it in writing. I have an email that states he is emailing the bank again. This just doesn’t seem fair. Can they make me an offer and then do noting about it one way or the other? What are my options if any?
#7Scott FicekSeptember 20, 2010, 6:33 pm
It depends upon where you are located, but in Minnesota, you could file for a rent abatement against your landlord. It is kind of like a reverse eviction against your landlord to force them to the table.
#8Susan SigalSeptember 21, 2010, 12:27 pm
I’m not sure how an abatement would work. Isn’t that usually if the unit is inhabitable? They also haven’t asked for any rent during this period.
#9Scott FicekSeptember 22, 2010, 10:48 am
Not really. This can be used to force the landlord to fix a problem. For example, maybe the front steps are falling down and they are a dangerous condition. You can still go in the back door, but this should be repaired. You can file against the landlord to get them to take action.
It may not apply 100% is this situation, but at least you have tied them up in court. You didn’t mention what county/city you are in, but many cities have a free tenant hotline to contact for legal questions.
Keep in mind that now in Minnesota, the bank must honor your original lease and keep you in the property.
#10bizboyJanuary 19, 2012, 2:25 pm
Your articles states:
Late fees will now be capped at 8% of the rental amount. This provision begins on January 1, 2011. You can not charge daily late fees either.
I don’t see anything in HF2668 that says you can’t charge daily late fees? Where did you get this idea?
#11Scott FicekJanuary 19, 2012, 9:37 pm
Great question. I wrote that post a long time ago. I don’t remember where I got the details. I believe some of it came in a summary from my real estate attorney.
Add your comment