Subscribe to RSS

Correction: Plumbing Clogs are Landlord’s Problem

Like most landlords, I have learned most of what I know about tenants and toilets through my own

experience and mistakes.  Occasionally, I do learn a new trick from another landlord.  Sometimes that learning comes because I asked a specific question of them when I was stuck on what to do, other times it comes when I am helping new investors buy property and the learning simply presents itself.

Previously I published a post regarding “Power Lease Clauses for Your Investment Property“.  I had accumulated many of these clauses over time reviewing leases at Minnesota Investment properties that my customers were buying.  While I am not an attorney, most of these clauses seemed reasonable and if the tenant was given this requirement up front, I assumed it was all legal and within statutes.

I enjoy reading Kelly Klein’s posts on the Star Tribune website.  She is a real estate attorney in Minneapolis and answers questions from the public in her weekly column.  Her November 14, 2008 column made me rethink the #1 clause I had on the above article.  It said:

“All drains, waste pipes, and plumbing are accepted as clear by the tenant at the time of occupancy and any material blocking them after occupancy shall be repaired by the tenant except blockages caused by roots or backups from the street.”

All drains, waste pipes, and plumbing are accepted as clear by the tenant at the time of occupancy and any material blocking them after occupancy shall be repaired by the tenant except blockages caused by roots or backups from the street.

Again, I felt like this was not an unfair clause to put in a lease.  I have experienced tenants pouring pans full of grease down the drain, not because they are trying to be malicious, but simply because they didn’t think it was a problem.  Unfortunately, Kelly makes an argument (albeit brief) that in Minnesota, the landlord has the responsibility to “maintain the premises, which includes keeping the pipes and toilet in good working order”.

I am always willing to accept when I am wrong, but I think the clause is still usable and reasonable.  The clause could be reworked to read:

“All drains, waste pipes, and plumbing are accepted as clear by the tenant at the time of occupancy and any atypical material (such as toys, clothing, diapers, etc) blocking them after occupancy shall be repaired by the landlord with tenant paying all costs of repairs.”

Again, I am not an attorney, but I think a reasonable person (ie:  housing judge), would see the intent of this clause and probably give you the benefit of the doubt.  Tell me what you think!

11 comments

#1John GallDecember 2, 2008, 10:12 am

Good point Scott. One thing she doesn’t mention and I could be wrong buuuttt. Say you had that clause in your lease. Your tenant puts grease toys etc down the toilet you fix it and send them an invoice they never pay. When they move out you simply keep the money from the deposit and sent them the lease clause. I would think that 90% would never pursue the matter and the 10% would have to go through the trouble of sueing (sp?) to recover that small portion of the deposit. Most never will so even if the law may be grey on how effective the clause is you likley will be able to recover the repair costs out of the deposit etc. Just my 2cents.

#2Twin Cities Real Estate GalDecember 2, 2008, 11:24 am

Good thought Scott. I agree, most tenants are not malicious but since most have never owned their own home, tend to not think twice when pouring things (ie – large jugs of grease which we have found MANY times in our properties…) down the drains.
Another thing we always want tenants to think about is the reporting of issues like plugged drains, running toilets, etc to the landlord ASAP before they become bigger issues and bills pile up. Maybe if they know they will be required to pay they will think twice!

#3minneapolis condosDecember 2, 2008, 4:46 pm

I think tree roots are the landlord’s issue and must be fixed by him or her. Stuffing diapers (tenant caused issues) are really the tenant’s responsibility. Great post Scott!

#4Rob BonahoomDecember 2, 2008, 11:20 pm

I like this new phrase. The cost of plumbers is very expensive and many times a tenant has no idea how much it costs to have them come out and repair a clogged toilet. This clause would both make them aware of the cost and take more responsiblity to maintain things for themselves.

#5Realty MNDecember 3, 2008, 9:15 pm

I like the point made by John Gall regarding retaining their deposit to cover the repair if they decide not to pay your invoice. I frequently withhold deposit money for damages and believe that money owed should be paid. These small things add up and are the difference between rental property ruining you financially and making a successful living at it.

#6Ned Carey saysDecember 4, 2008, 2:31 pm

The same is true in MD. I think you would be OK with the original clause but I think the revised version is much better.

In MD we use the term “as additional rent” as in “tenant paying all costs of repairs due as additional rent” the reasoning is they may be legally responsible for the repairs but unless it is actually rent, it can’t be used in rent court. Rent court is ONLY for rent in MD. It might be helpful in your state.

Ned Carey

#7andrewaJanuary 10, 2009, 2:48 pm

Here in South Africa the cure for grease in the toilet pipes is to send about 3KG (6 lbs) of caustic soda (Sodium hydroxide (Na OH ), also known as lye), in a strong water solution down the pipe. Its harmless to the sort of pipe plastics or ceramics we use here and of course coverts the grease and fats to soap whiich is water soluble. It is strongly alkaline so will eat any tree roots, human hair, tampons, t-shirts or any other organic substance etc blocking the pipe.P S wear protective glasses etc as splashes will blind you or give you alkaline burns.

#8WFMarch 6, 2010, 2:17 am

From a tenant’s point of view, am I just to accept the word of the landlord that all drains, waste pipes, and plumbing are clear at the time of occupancy? I’m one week in my apartment with no lease and am being subjected to a $500 plumbing bill. How am I to know that the problem was not pre-existing? This does not seem right to me.

    #9Scott FicekMarch 8, 2010, 4:32 pm

    Interesting point. The landlord also takes your word that you are going to pay the rent and not trash the place. Some faith and trust must be given on both sides.

#10John GallMarch 8, 2010, 6:52 pm

WF, I would think you could test this during the walkthrough by flushing all toilets and running water down each sink.

#11NoahNovember 1, 2010, 3:53 pm

Okay, here’s the perspective a maintenance professional with about twenty years in the apartment industry. While I beleive there are many just causes for the mentioned clauses, a simple “things not to do” booklet presented to the new renter can alleviate most of the problems before they occor. Something as simple as putting reghular dishwashing liquid in a dishwasher can cause an enormous amount of property damage, so letting the new resident know that is a bad idea will likely prevent the issue in the first place. If you would like me to write teses documents for you, feel free to contact me at http://www.thefixitteacher.com

Add your comment

Nickname:
E-mail:
Website:
Comment:
Anti-Spam:

Other articlesgo to homepage

Landlord Call to Action:  Don’t Wait to Start The Eviction

Landlord Call to Action: Don’t Wait to Start The Eviction(7)

I was in eviction court last week in Hennepin County.  I love sitting and listening to the other court cases.  Sometimes it is a little like a case of Cops or Judge Judy!  It is good entertainment to hear what the landlord and tenant say about why they are in court today.
This last week I [...]

Eviction Woes

Eviction Woes(4)

I get a lot of questions about tenant evictions.  I suppose it is like any job, it is the one thing that landlords have in common across all investment properties.  Here is a recent note I received:
I have a renter who’s lease expired in September so she is on a month-to-month lease currently. She has [...]

Can You Be Liable for Comments About Tenants?

Can You Be Liable for Comments About Tenants?(1)

Everyone knows the drill, you take a rental application and you call the previous landlords to see what this person was like as a renter.  Surprisingly, despite the number of tenants I go through in a year, I rarely get those calls.  When I do, I am happy to tell the caller what I think [...]

High Maintenance Tenants

High Maintenance Tenants(3)

So everyone knows what a high maintenance person is.  In fact, some of us have dated (or are married to ) some (not you honey)!  These are people that just can’t seem to be satisfied with anything despite how good it is.  When you get one of these as a tenant, watch out.  They can [...]

Storing Your Tenant’s Stuff

Storing Your Tenant’s Stuff(3)

I have written several times about how much joy I get in having to store a tenant’s stuff after they move out.  This is really a kick in the teeth if I have to store it after I just evicted them.  Not only do they owe me money, they probably didn’t clean the place at [...]

read more

Contacts and information

  • 612-281-5419
  • Scott Ficek

Copyright, Scott Ficek-2011

Re/Max Advantage Plus
MN Real Estate Team
17850 Kenwood Trail
Lakeville, Mn 55044
952-898-5800

Social networks

Most popular categories

© 2011 Gadgetine Wordpress theme by orange-themes.com All rights reserved.