How a $19,900 Condo Was Still Too Expensive

15 July, 2010 (5) Comment

I am no stranger to selling cheap houses.  In 2008 & 2009, I sold well over 100 homes that were priced under $50k with the majority under $40k.  My cheapest house I sold was $12,500 back in March of 2009 (the bank netted $69 on the deal-read the post on my Saint Paul Real Estate site).

So with that all said, it was amazing to be out with a customer of mine the other day looking at condos in Brooklyn Park.  We looked at 4 that were priced at $19,900.  I remember saying to him “I can’t believe I am about to say this, but this condo is too expensive.”  Wow!   I would say even the cheapest new car these days costs more than $19,900.  So why did I say that?  Here is how the numbers break down:

Mortgage cost per month (if you can get one on this little principle)

$146
Association fees (includes heat, insurance, etc) $294
Monthly landlord insurance $20
Total expenses per month $460
 
Possible rent on a 1 bedroom condo in this area $550
Monthly cash flow $90


While $90 is not the worst cash flow I have ever seen, if this customer ever has to replace the flooring in the unit, it would require an entire year to pay back the cost of it!   We started talking about offering $15k for the unit and even at that price it is still not enough cash flow to make it worth it.  Now you could pay cash for this unit, but is it really that great a use of your money to get $146 per month for your $20k?

You can’t make every deal work.  Making it cheaper doesn’t always solve the problem.

Categories : Buying Property

Comments

It is extremely important to consider all monthly expenses when evaluating the ROI of an investment property. Watch out for those association dues! I’ve seen some in Blaine that make you scratch you head as well?! Thanks Scott!

John Gall July 17, 2010

Was this at Strawberry Commons?

Scott Ficek July 18, 2010

LOL! Yup.

Chris Lengquist July 31, 2010

It’s all about the math, isn’t it? :)

Scott Grant August 22, 2010

This doesn’t seem that bad. Am I missing something? If you pay cash, in this example, your cashflow would be 90+146 per month, or 2832 per year, which is a 14.16% return on $20K, per year. This seems not too shabby to me, with few maintenance worries. I noticed that property taxes weren’t mentioned, but that could be in the association fees.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word