Buying MN Investment Property with Cash Flow, Another Thought
If you're new here (and you like what you read), you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! Scott
In December, I wrote about how I was surprised that anyone would consider buying an investment property with little or negative
cash flow. I think new investors make the mistake of assuming that your cash flow is simply your rent minus your mortgage payment. Let’s take a step back and make sure we are talking about the same cash flow:
Your property expenses are made of many of the following items (and others that may be specific to your building):
- Property Taxes
- Insurance for your Investment Property
- Water, sewer, garbage (depending upon your city)
- Heat and electricity either for the common areas or if you as the landlord is paying those bills
- Snow removal, lawn care
- Repair and Maintenance (only materials if you are doing it yourself)
- Property management
- Vacancies (this is one of the biggest areas that landlords forget about)
- Turnover repairs and updates (some of this may be charged to the outgoing tenant as damages, but what about painting the unit?)
- Advertising costs for that turnover
- Homeowner Association Fees if you are in a townhouse or condo
Only by including these items can you truly analyze your investment property cash flow.
Have you always wanted to buy investment property, but never knew where to start? Don’t Wait! Get Started now.
Scott Ficek is a Minnesota Real Estate Agent with Keller Williams Integrity in Minneapolis and helps new and seasoned investors buy and own Investment Property. He owns and manages almost 30 investment property units from single family to multi-family. Find his website at www.minnesotainvestmentrealestate.com or receive his blog via your RSS Feed or in your Email.
Seeing the Real Estate Market Bottom in the Rear View Mirror
8 Tricks to Getting Your Offer Accepted on that Foreclosed Property
Don't Trust What You See or Read on the MLS!
February 17th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Vacancy is certainly a factor especially for a first time investor. I bought a home on 12/27/07 could have rented it on 1/15/07 to questionable tennants, had a business trip that caused me to not show the property until 1/24/2007 then the ones that finally qualified wanted to move in 3/1/2007. We settled on 2/15/2007 so I missed 50 % of a mortgage payment to get a properly screened tennant. Based on your blog my lease ends on 5/31 so hopefully my next go around will be easier and with a higher rental rate.
February 17th, 2008 at 11:19 pm
Hey John-
Good tenants are worth the wait. Like you found out…you can keep you place full 100% of the time if you are willing to take anyone. But I would argue it will cost you more in the end on evictions and repairs to take questionable tenants!
Nice thing with the 5/31 lease end is that you should have some time to get it rented.
February 18th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Don’t forget HOA fees. Those can get hefty. And if you are self-managing there are advertising expenses.
Great job.
February 18th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Oops. You are correct Chris…Even the “expert” forgot the HOA fees. I figure the advertising expenses as turnover expenses or corporate fees (like CPA charges), but you point is valid.
Thanks!
February 18th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Scott, My intention was not to show you up!!!!
You are fantastic at what you do and it is appreciated.