Best Type of Property Investment for First Time Investors
Part 2 in my answers to my post “I Know You Have Questions“. John Gall asked: “Of all the types of rental property, is there one type you’d recommend for a first timer?” I get asked this question often, here is my response (also check out my post: How to become a Real Estate Investor):
I’m not trying to be evasive, but my answer is always “it depends”. When I meet a new investor for the first time, this is usually a 20-30 minute discussion. Initially, I like to ask some probing questions to help develop an opinion about what types of properties may be best for them starting out, such as:
- This may seem obvious, but how much money you have to invest will play a major roll in what type/size of buildings you should look to purchase.
- Why are you buying investment property and/or how many are you planning to acquire eventually?

- How active can you (or want to) be in the properties and/or how busy is your life?
- Where do you want to own properties?
Here are some characteristics of each type of property investment:
Single family houses or townhouses
- There is less cash investment required to buy single family houses than multi-family, but when the property is vacant there is $0 coming in. Fortunately, it is easier to sell single family investments as it can be sold to either another investor or to a family (owner occupant).
- Single Family Rentals typically have lower management/time requirements as the tenants often tend to be former homeowners that will require less attention.
- Finding single family houses is simple as they are everywhere, although some neighborhood price ranges may not support rentals.
- As you increase the number of single family houses, management will increase, ie: owning 12 single family houses can be significantly more accounting work than three 4-plex buildings. You will also have 12 roofs, 12 furnaces, 12 water heaters to maintain versus the 4-plex buildings that may have common elements.
- Leasing single family houses can be easy or difficult depending upon the rent amount you are looking for. If your rent is just a small amount about the price of a comparably size apartment it is easier.
- Requires additional cash investment, but typically generates larger cash flow. Can be sold to an owner-occupant that wants to rent the 2nd side for additional income.
- Duplexes can be maintenance nightmares depending upon how/if it was converted from a single family house into a duplex. I have seen many terrible conversions that have poor space planning. The other problem is often the mechanicals are a mess. Whenever possible, you should attempt to find a duplex that was originally built as a duplex or one that was properly/logically converted (including having separate utilities for each tenant to minimize the landlord’s expenses).
- Duplexes are more prevalent in some neighborhoods than in others, but can be found almost anywhere.
- Every investor should have a few duplexes in their portfolio to diversify their holdings. Duplexes are a good combination of multi-family pedigree with a single-family demeanor.
- Although leasing duplexes can be easy, having adequate storage space and laundry facilities for both units can be a challenge depending upon the layout of the building.
4-plex
- Buying a 4-plex, as expected, requires a larger cash investment, but will often generate enough cash flow to still cover expenses when one unit is vacant. Typically these buildings are never owner occupied. Depending upon the condition, larger cash reserves may be required for larger repairs (roofs, boilers, etc).

- Because you have four units under one roof, you are beginning to take advantage of economies of scale, ie: even though you have four units, there is one front door, one roof, one yard to mow. Maintenance can typically still be done at residential standards, but may cost more because of the size. The majority of 4-plexes were built as 4 unit buildings and are therefore easier to maintain and will have held up better over the years of being a rental.
- Most 4-plex properties are in older, central neighborhoods. Very infrequently will you find more than one or two in newer suburbs.
- Owning a 4-plex building can require more time and management than smaller buildings because they often have common hallways and common mechanicals that smaller buildings do not have. This additional work should be off-set by the potential for higher cash flow.
- When you are leasing an apartment in these buildings, you will be competing with larger buildings on rent and amenities. A problem tenant can also affect the other tenants and turn it into 4 unhappy tenants.
Larger Buildings (5 units+)
- Buildings larger than 4 units will require commercial financing which will have higher interest rates, typically 5 year loan lengths (on 25-30 year amortizations), and 20% down payment requirements.
- These buildings can require large cash reserves as they often have commercial grade mechanicals. Replacing a roof or a boiler may be a $20-30,000 project.
- You will again enjoy even better economies of scale if purchase correctly with larger cash flows.
- Tenants in larger buildings tend to be less loyal to the building/landlord and will move more often. You may be working on leasing a unit almost every month.
As you can see, each building style has different pros and cons.
You’re probably saying: “He still hasn’t answered the question!”. If I had to vote and give my preferred building for a first time investor (without any other factors), I would recommend a duplex. I believe they are easier to manage as tenants are more loyal and stay longer, they can be maintained just like a single family house, they are normally easy to find and sell, and they will often cash flow and appreciate nicely. Sorry you had to read so much to get the answer…like I said, this is normally a 30 minute discussion!




Scott, great post this is exceeded what I was looking for.
-John
Thanks so much. It did turn out pretty long, but it is a 30 minute discussion typically!
Love your post from a ‘management’ perspective. However, I think it is absolutely critical to first look at it from a ‘marketing’ perspective. What is the demand for the various types of housing and what is the supply? If you go for a high-demand-low-supply housing you will be able to charge a premium that will easily cover any incremental management costs. If you happen to go for the reverse (based on low management costs) you will have to accept market-led low rents and may also have vacancy issues. First find out where the market is, then select based on other criteria (e.g. managment costs).
Doug-
I do agree. but I think the ‘marketing’ perspective is a decision you make when looking at neighborhoods (early in the process). That is one of the first part of the conversations when I meet customers (it often also includes discussions about where they work, live, travel relative to these neighborhoods). Then we discuss type/size of properties (ie: this post). Then quality of buildings which may also allow for premium rent (such as larger than average rooms, architecturally significant, good amenities).
Thanks for the comment!
Scott